|



| |
Nonviolence does not men
the mere absence of violence. It is something more positive, more meaningful
that that. The true expression of nonviolence is compassion, which is not
just a passive emotional response, but a rational stimulus to action.
Responding to violence
with more violence is rarely appropriate. However, discussing nonviolence
when things are going smoothly does not carry much weight. It is precisely
when things become really difficult, urgent, and critical that we should
think and act with nonviolence.
Nonviolence is not a
question of holiness, it is a question of reality.
Violence, once it starts,
is by its nature very unpredictable. Originally you intend limited use of
force. Then counterreacton. Difficult to stop. Devastation. So always, I
feel, it is better to avoid violence.
In order to make
nonviolence, which is a physical expression of compassion, a reality, we
must first work on internal disarmament and then proceed to work on external
disagreement.
His Holiness The Dalai Lama

Our knowledge about the impact of trauma
and abuse has brought the notion of defining “safety” to the foreground and we
have come to embrace that notion not just as a clinical, but also as a political
idea, and we actively connect the two realms with our patients.
Nonviolence: Building
Social Immunity
-
The Sanctuary Model concept
of safety encompasses physical,
psychological,
social, and
moral
safety and then insist that everyone in the environment – from leader to
newest client – must adhere to the policy of nonviolence if they want to
participate in our community.
Defining Nonviolence
- Nonviolence: Either, (1) The behavior of people who in a conflict refrain from
violent acts. Or, (2) Any of several belief systems that reject violence on principle, not
just as impractical.
- Otherwise, the term is best not used, since it often contributes to ambiguity and
confusion. To describe specific actions or movements, the recommended terms are:
"nonviolent action," "nonviolent resistance," or "nonviolent
struggle."
- Nonviolent action: A technique of action in conflicts in which participants
conduct the struggle by doing -- or refusing to do -- certain acts without using physical
violence. It is an alternative to both passive submission and violence. The technique
includes many specific methods, which are grouped into three main classes: nonviolent
protest and persuasion, non-cooperation, and nonviolent intervention.
- The technique's variables include the motives for using it, the objectives, the
intended way success is to be accomplished (mechanism), and the relation between
nonviolent action and other forms of action.
- Nonviolent discipline: Orderly adherence to the planned strategy and tactics of
an action and to nonviolent behavior even in face of repression. This is a major factor
contributing to the success of a nonviolent struggle movement.
- Nonviolent resistance: Nonviolent struggle, conducted largely by non-cooperation,
in reaction to a disapproved act, policy, or government. The broader terms
"nonviolent action: and "nonviolent struggle" are therefore preferred to
refer to the overall nonviolent technique of action and to action in which the nonviolent
group also takes the initiative or intervenes, as in a sit-in.
- Nonviolent sanctions: The methods of the technique of nonviolent action. The
term is used especially when one wishes to make clear that these methods are not merely
expressive behavior but are ways to wield power, exercise influence, inflict punishments,
and impose costs.
- Nonviolent struggle: A synonym for "nonviolent action." This term may
be used also to indicate that the nonviolent action in a conflict is particularly
purposeful or aggressive. "Nonviolent struggle" is especially useful to describe
nonviolent action against determined and resourceful opponents who use repressive measures
and countermeasures.
from A JOURNALIST'S BRIEF GLOSSARY OF NONVIOLENT STRUGGLE a
publication of The Albert Einstein Institution, 50 Church Street, Cambridge, MA
02138 Tel: (617)876 0311, Fax: (617)876 0837, Email:
einstein@igc.apc.org
Nonviolence: Twenty-Five Lessons from the History of a Dangerous Idea by Mark
Kurlansky
-
There is no proactive
word for nonviolence
-
Nations that build
military forces as deterrents will eventually use them
-
Practitioners of
nonviolence are seen as enemies of the state
-
Once a state takes over a
religion, the religion loses its nonviolent teachings
-
A rebel can be defanged
and co-opted by making him a saint after he is dead
-
Somewhere behind every
war there are always a few founding lies.
-
A propaganda machine
promoting hatred always has a war waiting in the wings.
-
People who go to war
start to resemble their enemy.
-
A conflict between a
violent and nonviolent force is a moral argument. If the violent side can
provoke the nonviolent side into violence, the violent side has won.
-
The problem lies not in
the nature of man but in the nature of power.
-
The longer a war lasts,
the less popular it becomes.
-
The state imagines it is
impotent without a military because it cannot conceive of power without
force.
-
It is often not the
largest but the best organized and most articulate group that prevails.
-
All debate momentarily
ends with an “enforced silence” once the first shots are fired.
-
A shooting war is not
necessary to overthrown an established power but is used to consolidate the
revolution itself.
-
Violence does not
resolve. It always leads to more violence.
-
Warfare produces peace
activists. A group of veterans is a likely place to find peace activists.
-
People motivated be fear
do not act well.
-
While it is perfectly
feasible to convince a people faced with brutal repression to rise up in a
suicidal attach on their oppressor, it is almost impossible to convince them
to meet deadly violence with nonviolent resistance.
-
Wars do not have to be
sold to the general public if they can be carried out by an all-volunteer
professional military.
-
Once you start the
business of killing, you just get “deeper and deeper” without limits.
-
Nonviolence: Twenty-Five
Lessons
-
Violence always comes
with a supposedly rational explanation – which is only dismissed as
irrational if the violence fails.
-
Violence is a virus that
infects and takes over.
-
The miracle is that
despite all of society’s promotion of warfare, most soldiers find warfare to
be a wrenching departure from their own moral values.
-
The hard work of
beginning a movement to end war has already been done.
 |
Mental Models |
| |
|
 |
Sanctuary Model of Organizational Change |
| |
|
 |
Components of the Sanctuary Model |
| |
|
 |
Social Legacy of Trauma |
| |
|
 |
Trauma Theory |
| |
|
 |
Seven
Commitments of Sanctuary |
|