|



| |
Moral safety
is a subject that is even more difficult to describe. It is a search and a
process. It is an attempt to reduce the hypocrisy that is present, both
explicitly and implicitly, in our social systems. A morally safe
environment is one that permits an ongoing ethical dialogue, a search for
higher meaning and purpose. Such a setting
articulates and manifests in practice the values that it represents – honesty,
compassion, a search for integrity, kindness, courage, justice, an honoring of
the past and hope for the future. Exposure to
interpersonal violence is fundamentally about the abuse of power and it shakes
the very foundations of meaning and moral purpose, the very deepest spiritual
and philosophical beliefs. A
health-promoting, morally safe environment therefore, is one that wrestles
constantly with the issue of power and how power can be utilized in ways that
promote health and healing instead of sickness, abuse and decay.
It is an
environment that attempts to minimize the abuse of power through the routine
employment of democratic principles of practice.
The
therapeutic environment must be able to thoroughly analyze and address abuses
of power on the part of both patients and staff in ways that promote learning,
growth, and change. It is a
fundamentally important quest for patients who are victims of abusive power
because their internal systems of meaning have become confused and
contradictory. A morally safe
environment engages in an on-going struggle with the issues of honesty and
integrity. In any
environment this means beginning with a self-evaluative look at our
therapeutic presumptions, our training, our rationalizations, and our fixed
beliefs, as well as our practice. Each system
must look at its own issues with authority and become willing to participate
in, not just manage, the relational web that forms the structure of the
program, willing to ask questions like, “What do we really believe in?” “What
is it that we are actually doing, and what are we trying to achieve?” “Will
the means get us to the desired ends?” “Do the means justify the ends?”
“Do the activities we are prescribing lead to autonomy, connectedness, and
empowerment or dependence, alienation and helplessness?” Similarly, our
clients must confront the breaches in moral integrity that characterize the
specific systems within which their normative behavior developed, be it their
family, a religious organization, another form of a cult, or an institution.
A morally safe
approach also entails looking at the way our society is organized around
unresolved traumatic experience – what I have called the “Nine A’s of Trauma”
- and manifests this dysfunction through disrupted attachments, unmodulated
affect, poorly managed aggression, abusive authority, diminished awareness,
multiple addictions including an addiction to trauma, automatic repetition of
destructive behaviors, avoidance of feelings and accountability, and
alienation from self and others (Bloom, 1997; Bloom and Reichert, 1998).
S.E.L.F. - A Trauma-Informed
Psychoeducational Group Curriculum
Articles about S.E.L.F./S.A.G.E.
S.E.L.F.
Safety
Physical
Safety
Psychological Safety
Social
Safety
Emotional
management
Loss
Future
|